All-in-One (Integrated) vs. All-in-Two (Split) Solar Street Lights: Which is Best for Highways?

December 09, 2025

For highway lighting, the choice between All-in-One (Integrated) Solar Street Lights and All-in-Two (Split) Solar Street Lights hinges on highway-specific requirements: high brightness, long runtime (10–12+ hours nightly), extreme durability (wind, temperature, vibration resistance), low maintenance, and optimal solar energy absorption. Below is a detailed comparison of their suitability for highways, along with a clear recommendation and selection criteria.

First, clarify the two configurations to frame the comparison:

All-in-One (Integrated): Combines solar panel, LED module, lithium battery, and controller into a single compact unit. Mounted directly on the light pole (no separate solar panel installation).

All-in-Two (Split): Splits the system into two parts:

A separate solar panel (mounted on the pole top or adjacent structure)

A light fixture (housing LED, battery, and controller) mounted lower on the pole.

Connected by wires (typically 3–5 meters).

Critical Comparison for Highway Applications

Highways demand uncompromising performance: they require 5,000–20,000+ lumens per fixture (to illuminate 10–20m wide lanes), reliable operation in -30°C to 60°C temperatures, resistance to high winds (≥12 level) and traffic vibrations, and minimal maintenance (since highway poles are hard to access).

Here’s how the two types stack up:

Evaluation Factor	All-in-One (Integrated)	All-in-Two (Split)
Brightness & Runtime (Highway Priority)	Limited by compact design: Solar panel size (max ~1.2㎡) and battery capacity (max ~100Ah) restrict output to 5,000–8,000 lumens. Runtime may drop to 6–8 hours in cloudy weather (insufficient for 24/7 highway needs).	No size constraints: Larger solar panels (1.5–3㎡) and high-capacity batteries (100–200Ah) deliver 8,000–20,000+ lumens. Supports 10–14 hours of continuous lighting (even in low sunlight) — meets highway “all-night” requirements.
Solar Energy Absorption	Fixed panel angle (integrated into the fixture) — hard to optimize for latitude/season. Risk of shading from nearby structures/poles.	Adjustable solar panel: Can be tilted to match local latitude (e.g., 30°–45° for optimal sun exposure) and mounted higher to avoid shading. Captures 20–30% more solar energy than all-in-one.
Durability & Environmental Resistance	Compact design = higher wind load (risk of pole damage in storms). Components are cramped, leading to poor heat dissipation — battery life shortens in high temperatures (critical for highways in deserts or tropical regions). Vibration from traffic may loosen internal connections.	Split design = lower wind resistance (solar panel mounted securely on pole top). Separate components allow better heat dissipation (battery/LED not exposed to direct sunlight with the panel), extending battery life by 30–50%. Sturdier wiring and mounts resist traffic vibrations.
Maintenance & Repairability	Fully integrated: If one component fails (e.g., battery or solar panel), the entire unit must be replaced. Highway maintenance requires cherry pickers — high replacement cost and downtime.	Modular design: Replace only faulty components (e.g., battery, LED) without removing the entire system. Solar panels can be inspected/cleaned separately (critical for dusty highways). Lower maintenance cost and shorter downtime.
Installation Complexity	Simple: One unit, no wiring between panel and fixture. Faster installation (15–20 mins per pole).	Slightly complex: Requires mounting the solar panel, running wires, and aligning the panel angle. Installation time (30–40 mins per pole) is longer but manageable with trained teams.
Cost (Initial vs. Long-Term)	Lower initial cost ($200–$500 per unit) — attractive for budget-constrained projects. Higher long-term cost: Shorter lifespan (3–5 years) and frequent replacements.	Higher initial cost ($400–$1,000 per unit) — offset by longer lifespan (5–8 years) and lower maintenance/ replacement costs. Total cost of ownership (TCO) is 40–60% lower over 5 years.
Suitability for Highway Lanes	Only viable for secondary highways, rural roads, or parking lot access roads (low traffic, moderate lighting needs).

Why All-in-Two (Split) is the Better Choice for Highways

Why All-in-Two (Split) Solar Street Lights is the Better Choice for Highways

Highways are critical infrastructure where performance, reliability, and low maintenance take priority over initial cost. All-in-two systems address the most pressing highway needs:

Adequate Brightness & Runtime: Larger components deliver the high lumens and long operating hours required to illuminate wide lanes and ensure driver safety.

Optimal Energy Harvesting: Adjustable solar panels maximize energy absorption, even in regions with variable sunlight (e.g., northern Europe, mountainous areas).

Durability in Harsh Conditions: Better heat dissipation and wind resistance ensure longevity in extreme weather (highways often span deserts, cold zones, or coastal areas with salt spray).

Cost-Effective Long-Term: Modular maintenance reduces downtime and replacement costs — critical for highways where lighting outages pose safety risks.

Exception: When to Choose All-in-One

All-in-one may be suitable for:

Secondary Roads/Rural Highways: Low traffic volume, shorter lighting distances (≤8m lane width), and easy maintenance access (e.g., roads near urban areas).

Temporary Lighting: Construction zones or emergency highway repairs (fast installation, no long-term commitment).

Budget Constraints: Small-scale projects with limited funding (but plan for higher replacement costs after 3–4 years).

Key Selection Tips for Highway Solar Street Lights (All-in-Two Priority)

If opting for all-in-two (the recommended choice), focus on these highway-specific specs:

Brightness & Uniformity: ≥10,000 lumens per fixture, 120°–150° beam angle (to cover 12–15m lane width), and uniform light distribution (no dark spots).

Battery Performance: Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries (temperature-resistant, 2,000+ charge cycles) with ≥100Ah capacity (supports 12 hours runtime in cloudy weather).

Solar Panel: Monocrystalline silicon (higher efficiency, ≥23% conversion rate) with ≥1.5㎡ area (for high latitudes or low sunlight regions).

Durability Ratings: IP67+ waterproof rating (resists rain/snow), wind load resistance ≥0.6kN/㎡ (for storms), and vibration resistance (IEC 60068-2-6 standard for traffic vibrations).

Certifications: Compliance with highway standards (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS) and local road safety certifications (e.g., DOT in the US, ECE in Europe).

Warranty: ≥5-year warranty for the battery and LED module (reflects manufacturer confidence in long-term performance).

For primary highways, expressways, and high-traffic national roads, All-in-Two (Split) Solar Street Lights are the superior choice — they meet the strict requirements for brightness, runtime, durability, and low maintenance.

All-in-one systems are better suited for secondary roads or temporary applications where initial cost and quick installation are prioritized.

热门标签 :

All-in-One (Integrated) vs. All-in-Two (Split) Solar Street Lights: Which is Best for Highways?

All-in-Two Solar Street Lights

一体式太阳能路灯

一体化太阳能路灯

分体太阳能路灯

High brightness Solar Street Lights

Splits system Street Lights

Monocrystalline silicon Street Lights

Combines solar panel Street Lights

LiFePO4 batteries Street Lights